Squares and Square Roots | IT

Question 3

Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?

[Hint: From the diagonal property of a square, the line that bisects an angle passes through the opposite vertex. Argue why the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square bisect the two angles of the dotted square.**]

Solution

Understand the Question

In a square, the diagonals are perpendicular to each other, intersect at the center, and bisect the corner vertex angles ( $90^\circ$ into two $45^\circ$ angles).
The extensions of the horizontal and vertical sides of the original square are perpendicular to each other and pass through the center of the dotted square.
Because these lines bisect the vertex angles of the dotted square, they act as its diagonals. Since the vertices of a square lie on its diagonals, the lines must pass through the vertices of the dotted square.

Step 1 · Set Up Coordinate Lines and Diagram

Let the common vertex of the original solid square and the center of the dotted square be at origin $O(0, 0)$ . Diagram 1

The line extending along the horizontal side corresponds to the $x$ -axis.
The line extending along the vertical side corresponds to the $y$ -axis.

Step 2 · Angle Bisector and Diagonal Property

In any square:

Each corner angle measures $90^\circ$ .
A line that bisects a corner angle into two $45^\circ$ angles forms a diagonal of the square and passes through the opposite vertex.
The two diagonals of a square are perpendicular to each other and intersect at its center $O$ .

Step 3 · Relate Extensions to the Dotted Square's Diagonals

The horizontal and vertical extensions ( $x$ -axis and $y$ -axis):

Are perpendicular to each other ( $90^\circ$ ).
Pass through the center $O$ of the dotted square.
Bisect the vertex angles of the dotted square into $45^\circ$ .

Therefore, these two extension lines coincide exactly with the diagonals of the dotted square.

Step 4 · Conclusion

Since the vertices of a square always lie on its diagonals, and the side extensions are the diagonals of the dotted square, the extensions of the horizontal and vertical sides must pass through the four vertices of the dotted square.

Answer

The perpendicular horizontal and vertical side extensions pass through the center and bisect the angles of the dotted square, making them the diagonals of the dotted square. Since a square's vertices lie along its diagonals, the extensions must pass through all vertices of the dotted square.

Common Mistakes

Overlooking Diagonal Properties: Forgetting that in a square, the angle bisector of a vertex is identical to its diagonal.
Missing Perpendicularity: Failing to state that the two side extensions are perpendicular ( $90^\circ$ ), which matches the property that diagonals of a square are mutually perpendicular.

More questions in IT

How can one construct a square having double the area of a given square?

Why does the new dotted square have double the area of the original square?

In many of the constructions in the Śulba-Sūtra, it is desirable to construct, where needed, what Baudhāyana calls ‘east-west’ and ‘north-south’ lines, i.e., horizontal and vertical lines that are perpendicular to each other. Can you draw some horizontal and vertical lines to see why the new square has double the area of the original square? You could draw some horizontal and vertical lines as shown on the right.

Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?

Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.

Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?

Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?

Why is the smaller inside square half the area of the larger square?

Again, adding some east-west and north-south lines can explain it:

Why is $PQRS$ a square? Why is its area half that of the original paper?

Explain by connecting $QS$ and $PR$ , finding the different angles formed, and then using tringle congruence.

Find the hypotenuse of this isosceles right triangle.

What is the value of $\sqrt{2}$ ?

Q10

Is $\sqrt{2}$ less than or greater than 1?

Q11

Is $\sqrt{2}$ less than or greater than 2?

Q12

Can we find closer bounds for $\sqrt{2}$ ?

Q13

Will we ever get a number with a terminating decimal representation whose square is 2?

If there is such a terminating decimal starting with $1.414\dots$ whose square is 2, then it must have a non-zero last digit. If this is the case, then the decimal representation of its square will also have a non-zero last digit after the decimal point. For example, if $\sqrt{2}$ is of the form $1.414\dots4$ , then its square will be of the form—

Q14

Use this formula to check your answers in the Figure it Out on page 39.

Q15

What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?

Q16

Why does Baudhāyana’s method work?

Q17

Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?

Q19

Explain why all the angles of this new 4-sided figure are right angles and so it is a square.

Q20

List down all the Baudhāyana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20.

Q21

Is there an unending sequence of Baudhāyana triples?

Q22

Is $(30, 40, 50)$ a Baudhāyana triple?

Is $(300, 400, 500)$ a Baudhāyana triple?

Q23

Context: The list of Baudhāyana triples having numbers less than or equal to 20 contains the following triples — $(3, 4, 5)$ , $(6, 8, 10)$ , $(9, 12, 15)$ , $(12, 16, 20)$ .

Q. Do you see any pattern among them?

Q24

Context: All these triples can be obtained by multiplying each term of $(3, 4, 5)$ by a certain positive integer.

Q. Can we form a conjecture on Baudhāyana triples based on this observation?

Q25

Context: Conjecture: $(3k, 4k, 5k)$ is a Baudhāyana triple, where $k$ is any positive integer.

Q. Is this true?

Q26

Is $(5, 12, 13)$ a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to $20$ ?

Q27

Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?

Q28

If $(a, b, c)$ is non-primitive, and the integers have $f$ — greater than 1 — as a common factor, then is $\left(\dfrac{a}{f}, \dfrac{b}{f}, \dfrac{c}{f}\right)$ a Baudhayana triple? Check this statement for $(9, 12, 15)$ . Justify this statement.