Question 26
Is a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20?
A Baudhayana triple is a set of three positive whole numbers such that . A primitive Baudhayana triple is one where have no common factors other than 1.
Step 1 — Verify if is a Baudhayana triple
Let us check if the numbers satisfy the condition . Here, we have , , and . First, we will calculate the sum of the squares of the first two numbers. Next, we will calculate the square of the third number. Since , the numbers form a Baudhayana triple.
Step 2 — Check for primitivity of
A Baudhayana triple is called primitive if its three numbers have no common factors other than 1. Let us find the factors of each number in the triple . The factors of 5 are 1, 5. The factors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12. The factors of 13 are 1, 13. The only common factor for 5, 12, and 13 is 1. So, the triple is a primitive Baudhayana triple.
Step 3 — Find other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20
We can find primitive Baudhayana triples using a special formula. Let and be two positive whole numbers. These numbers must satisfy three conditions:
- must be greater than ().
- and must have no common factors other than 1 (they are coprime).
- One of or must be an even number. If these conditions are met, the primitive Baudhayana triple can be found using these formulas: We need to find triples where all three numbers () are less than or equal to 20.
Let us test different values for and :
Case 1: Let , . These values satisfy all conditions: , 2 and 1 are coprime, and 2 is an even number. The triple is . All numbers (3, 4, 5) are less than or equal to 20. This is a primitive Baudhayana triple.
Case 2: Let , . These values satisfy all conditions: , 3 and 2 are coprime, and 2 is an even number. The triple is . All numbers (5, 12, 13) are less than or equal to 20. This is the triple given in the question.
Case 3: Let , . These values satisfy all conditions: , 4 and 1 are coprime, and 4 is an even number. The triple is . All numbers (15, 8, 17) are less than or equal to 20. This is a primitive Baudhayana triple.
Case 4: Let , . These values satisfy conditions: , 4 and 3 are coprime, and 4 is an even number. Here, and are greater than 20. So, this triple is not included. If we try larger values for , the value of will become even larger than 20. For example, if , then , which is already greater than 20. So, we can stop here.
The primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20 are , , and . The question asks for the "other" primitive Baudhayana triples, so we exclude .
Answer
(i) Yes, is a primitive Baudhayana triple. (ii) The other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20 are and .
More questions in IT
How can one construct a square having double the area of a given square?
Why does the new dotted square have double the area of the original square?
In many of the constructions in the Śulba-Sūtra, it is desirable to construct, where needed, what Baudhāyana calls ‘east-west’ and ‘north-south’ lines, i.e., horizontal and vertical lines that are perpendicular to each other. Can you draw some horizontal and vertical lines to see why the new square has double the area of the original square? You could draw some horizontal and vertical lines as shown on the right.
Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?
[Hint: From the diagonal property of a square, the line that bisects an angle passes through the opposite vertex. Argue why the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square bisect the two angles of the dotted square.**]
Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.
Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?
Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?
Why is the smaller inside square half the area of the larger square?
Again, adding some east-west and north-south lines can explain it:
Why is PQRS a square? Why is its area half that of the original paper?
Explain by connecting QS and PR, finding the different angles formed, and then using tringle congruence.
Find the hypotenuse of this isosceles right triangle.
What is the value of ?
Is less than or greater than 1?
Is less than or greater than 2?
Can we find closer bounds for ?
Will we ever get a number with a terminating decimal representation whose square is 2?
If there is such a terminating decimal starting with 1.414... whose square is 2, then it must have a non-zero last digit. If this is the case, then the decimal representation of its square will also have a non-zero last digit after the decimal point. For example, if is of the form 1.414...4, then its square will be of the form—
Use this formula to check your answers in the Figure it Out on page 39.
What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?
Why does Baudhāyana’s method work?
Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?
Explain why all the angles of this new 4-sided figure are right angles and so it is a square.
List down all the Baudhāyana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20.
Is there an unending sequence of Baudhāyana triples?
Is (30, 40, 50) a Baudhāyana triple?
Is (300, 400, 500) a Baudhāyana triple?
Context: The list of Baudhāyana triples having numbers less than or equal to 20 contains the following triples — (3, 4, 5), (6, 8, 10), (9, 12, 15), (12, 16, 20).
Q. Do you see any pattern among them?
Context: All these triples can be obtained by multiplying each term of (3, 4, 5) by a certain positive integer.
Q. Can we form a conjecture on Baudhāyana triples based on this observation?
Context: Conjecture: (3k, 4k, 5k) is a Baudhāyana triple, where k is any positive integer.
Q. Is this true?
Is a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20?
Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?
If is non-primitive, and the integers have — greater than 1 — as a common factor, then is a Baudhayana triple? Check this statement for . Justify this statement.