Squares and Square Roots | IT

Question 15

What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?

Question diagram 1
Check your answer with HomiSolve it yourself, then let Homi check your steps and spot mistakes.
Solution
Understand the Question
  • If we have two squares of different side lengths aa and bb, their areas are a2a^2 and b2b^2.
  • A large square whose area is the sum of these two squares will have an area of c2=a2+b2c^2 = a^2 + b^2, where cc is its side length.
  • This relationship matches the Pythagoras theorem (a2+b2=c2a^2 + b^2 = c^2), meaning the side of the new square cc is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle with perpendicular sides (legs) of lengths aa and bb.

Step 1 · Relate the Areas of the Squares

Let the side lengths of the two smaller squares be aa and bb. Area of first square=a2\text{Area of first square} = a^2 Area of second square=b2\text{Area of second square} = b^2

Let the side length of the new large square be cc. Area of large square=c2\text{Area of large square} = c^2

Since the area of the large square is the sum of the two smaller squares: c2=a2+b2c^2 = a^2 + b^2Diagram 1

Step 2 · Apply the Pythagoras Theorem

The relation c2=a2+b2c^2 = a^2 + b^2 represents the Pythagoras theorem for a right-angled triangle.Diagram 2

In a right-angled triangle with legs aa and bb and hypotenuse cc: a2+b2=c2a^2 + b^2 = c^2

Therefore, the side length cc of the new square is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose perpendicular legs are aa and bb.

Step 3 · Construct the New Square

To construct the large square geometrically:

  1. Draw a line segment of length aa.
  2. Draw another segment of length bb perpendicular (9090^\circ) to the first segment.
  3. Connect the endpoints to form the hypotenuse of length cc.
  4. Construct a square with side length cc.Diagram 3

The area of this constructed square is: c2=a2+b2c^2 = a^2 + b^2

Answer

The side length of the new large square is the hypotenuse (cc) of a right-angled triangle with legs equal to the side lengths (aa and bb) of the two smaller squares, satisfying c2=a2+b2c^2 = a^2 + b^2.

Common Mistakes
  • Adding Side Lengths Directly: Mistakenly assuming the new side length is a+ba + b instead of a2+b2\sqrt{a^2 + b^2}. The areas add up (a2+b2a^2 + b^2), not the perimeter or linear lengths.
  • Ignoring the Right Angle: Forgetting that segments aa and bb must meet at exactly 9090^\circ for the connecting segment to equal a2+b2\sqrt{a^2 + b^2} via the Pythagoras theorem.

More questions in IT

Q1

How can one construct a square having double the area of a given square?

Q2

Why does the new dotted square have double the area of the original square?

In many of the constructions in the Śulba-Sūtra, it is desirable to construct, where needed, what Baudhāyana calls ‘east-west’ and ‘north-south’ lines, i.e., horizontal and vertical lines that are perpendicular to each other. Can you draw some horizontal and vertical lines to see why the new square has double the area of the original square? You could draw some horizontal and vertical lines as shown on the right.

Q3

Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?

[Hint: From the diagonal property of a square, the line that bisects an angle passes through the opposite vertex. Argue why the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square bisect the two angles of the dotted square.**]

Q4

Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.

Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?

Q5

Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?

Q6

Why is the smaller inside square half the area of the larger square?

Again, adding some east-west and north-south lines can explain it:

Q7

Why is PQRSPQRS a square? Why is its area half that of the original paper?

Explain by connecting QSQS and PRPR, finding the different angles formed, and then using tringle congruence.

Q8

Find the hypotenuse of this isosceles right triangle.

Q9

What is the value of 2\sqrt{2}?

Q10

Is 2\sqrt{2} less than or greater than 1?

Q11

Is 2\sqrt{2} less than or greater than 2?

Q12

Can we find closer bounds for 2\sqrt{2}?

Q13

Will we ever get a number with a terminating decimal representation whose square is 2?

If there is such a terminating decimal starting with 1.4141.414\dots whose square is 2, then it must have a non-zero last digit. If this is the case, then the decimal representation of its square will also have a non-zero last digit after the decimal point. For example, if 2\sqrt{2} is of the form 1.41441.414\dots4, then its square will be of the form—

Q14

Use this formula to check your answers in the Figure it Out on page 39.

Q15

What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?

Q16

Why does Baudhāyana’s method work?

Q17

Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?

Q19

Explain why all the angles of this new 4-sided figure are right angles and so it is a square.

Q20

List down all the Baudhāyana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20.

Q21

Is there an unending sequence of Baudhāyana triples?

Q22

Is (30,40,50)(30, 40, 50) a Baudhāyana triple?

Is (300,400,500)(300, 400, 500) a Baudhāyana triple?

Q23

Context: The list of Baudhāyana triples having numbers less than or equal to 20 contains the following triples — (3,4,5)(3, 4, 5), (6,8,10)(6, 8, 10), (9,12,15)(9, 12, 15), (12,16,20)(12, 16, 20).

Q. Do you see any pattern among them?

Q24

Context: All these triples can be obtained by multiplying each term of (3,4,5)(3, 4, 5) by a certain positive integer.

Q. Can we form a conjecture on Baudhāyana triples based on this observation?

Q25

Context: Conjecture: (3k,4k,5k)(3k, 4k, 5k) is a Baudhāyana triple, where kk is any positive integer.

Q. Is this true?

Q26

Is (5,12,13)(5, 12, 13) a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 2020?

Q27

Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?

Q28

If (a,b,c)(a, b, c) is non-primitive, and the integers have ff — greater than 1 — as a common factor, then is (af,bf,cf)\left(\dfrac{a}{f}, \dfrac{b}{f}, \dfrac{c}{f}\right) a Baudhayana triple? Check this statement for (9,12,15)(9, 12, 15). Justify this statement.

← Back to Squares and Square Roots