Squares and Square Roots | IT

Question 15

What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?

Question diagram 1
Check your answer with HomiSolve it yourself, then let Homi check your steps and spot mistakes.
Solution

The problem describes a relationship between the areas of squares, which can be solved using the Pythagorean theorem.

Step 1 — Defining the square areas

Let us consider two squares of different sizes. Let the side length of the first square be aa. Its area will be a×aa \times a, which is a2a^2. Let the side length of the second square be bb. Its area will be b×bb \times b, which is b2b^2. We want to combine them to make a new, larger square. Let the side length of this new large square be cc. Its area will be c×cc \times c, which is c2c^2. The problem states that the area of the large square is the sum of the areas of the two smaller squares. So, we can write this as an equation:

c2=a2+b2c^2 = a^2 + b^2

Area of large square=Area of small square 1+Area of small square 2\boxed{\text{Area of large square} = \text{Area of small square 1} + \text{Area of small square 2}}

Diagram 1

Step 2 — Applying the Pythagorean Theorem

The equation c2=a2+b2c^2 = a^2 + b^2 is very special in geometry. It is the famous Pythagorean theorem. This theorem applies to right-angled triangles. A right-angled triangle has one angle that is exactly 90 degrees. The longest side of a right-angled triangle is called the hypotenuse. The other two sides are called legs. The Pythagorean theorem states that the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides. If we have a right-angled triangle with legs of length aa and bb, and its hypotenuse is cc, then:

a2+b2=c2a^2 + b^2 = c^2

This is exactly the same relationship we found for the areas of our squares. So, to find the side length cc of the new large square, we need to find the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle. The legs of this triangle must be the side lengths of the two smaller squares, aa and bb.

The side ’c’ is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs ’a’ and ’b’\boxed{\text{The side 'c' is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs 'a' and 'b'}}

Diagram 2

Step 3 — Constructing the large square

First, draw a straight line segment of length aa. At one end of this segment, draw another line segment of length bb. Make sure this second segment is at a 90-degree angle to the first segment. Now, connect the open ends of these two segments. This connecting line will be the hypotenuse of the right-angled triangle. Let its length be cc. This length cc is the side length of the new large square we want to create. Finally, construct a square using this length cc as its side. The area of this new square will be c2c^2, which is a2+b2a^2 + b^2.

The new square has side length equal to the hypotenuse\boxed{\text{The new square has side length equal to the hypotenuse}}

Diagram 3

Answer

(i) The side length of the new large square will be the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle. (ii) The legs of this right-angled triangle must be the side lengths of the two smaller squares. (iii) This method uses the Pythagorean theorem to find the side length of the combined square.

More questions in IT

Q1

How can one construct a square having double the area of a given square?

Q2

Why does the new dotted square have double the area of the original square?

In many of the constructions in the Śulba-Sūtra, it is desirable to construct, where needed, what Baudhāyana calls ‘east-west’ and ‘north-south’ lines, i.e., horizontal and vertical lines that are perpendicular to each other. Can you draw some horizontal and vertical lines to see why the new square has double the area of the original square? You could draw some horizontal and vertical lines as shown on the right.

Q3

Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?

[Hint: From the diagonal property of a square, the line that bisects an angle passes through the opposite vertex. Argue why the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square bisect the two angles of the dotted square.**]

Q4

Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.

Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?

Q5

Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?

Q6

Why is the smaller inside square half the area of the larger square?

Again, adding some east-west and north-south lines can explain it:

Q7

Why is PQRS a square? Why is its area half that of the original paper?

Explain by connecting QS and PR, finding the different angles formed, and then using tringle congruence.

Q8

Find the hypotenuse of this isosceles right triangle.

Q9

What is the value of 2\sqrt{2}?

Q10

Is 2\sqrt{2} less than or greater than 1?

Q11

Is 2\sqrt{2} less than or greater than 2?

Q12

Can we find closer bounds for 2\sqrt{2}?

Q13

Will we ever get a number with a terminating decimal representation whose square is 2?

If there is such a terminating decimal starting with 1.414... whose square is 2, then it must have a non-zero last digit. If this is the case, then the decimal representation of its square will also have a non-zero last digit after the decimal point. For example, if 2\sqrt{2} is of the form 1.414...4, then its square will be of the form—

Q14

Use this formula to check your answers in the Figure it Out on page 39.

Q15

What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?

Q16

Why does Baudhāyana’s method work?

Q17

Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?

Q19

Explain why all the angles of this new 4-sided figure are right angles and so it is a square.

Q20

List down all the Baudhāyana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20.

Q21

Is there an unending sequence of Baudhāyana triples?

Q22

Is (30, 40, 50) a Baudhāyana triple?

Is (300, 400, 500) a Baudhāyana triple?

Q23

Context: The list of Baudhāyana triples having numbers less than or equal to 20 contains the following triples — (3, 4, 5), (6, 8, 10), (9, 12, 15), (12, 16, 20).

Q. Do you see any pattern among them?

Q24

Context: All these triples can be obtained by multiplying each term of (3, 4, 5) by a certain positive integer.

Q. Can we form a conjecture on Baudhāyana triples based on this observation?

Q25

Context: Conjecture: (3k, 4k, 5k) is a Baudhāyana triple, where k is any positive integer.

Q. Is this true?

Q26

Is (5,12,13)(5, 12, 13) a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20?

Q27

Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?

Q28

If (a,b,c)(a, b, c) is non-primitive, and the integers have ff — greater than 1 — as a common factor, then is (af,bf,cf)\left(\frac{a}{f}, \frac{b}{f}, \frac{c}{f}\right) a Baudhayana triple? Check this statement for (9,12,15)(9, 12, 15). Justify this statement.

← Back to Squares and Square Roots