Question 5
Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?

We can construct a square with half the area of the original square by connecting the midpoints of its sides.
Step 1 — Understanding the Area
Let the side length of the original square be . The area of this original square is found by multiplying its side length by itself.
We want to construct a new square whose area is half of this.
Let the side length of this new square be . Its area will be .
To find the side length , we take the square root of the desired area.
This means the side length of the new square must be divided by .
Step 2 — Geometric Construction Method
Let us consider the original square. We can find the midpoint of each of its four sides. A midpoint is the point exactly halfway along a line segment. Let us connect these four midpoints with straight lines. This will form a new figure inside the original square.
Let's check if this new figure is a square and what its area is. Consider one of the corners of the original square. This corner forms a right-angled triangle with two of the midpoints. The two shorter sides (legs) of this triangle are each half the side length of the original square, so they are . The longest side (hypotenuse) of this triangle is one of the sides of our new inner figure. We can use the Pythagorean theorem to find its length. The Pythagorean theorem states that in a right-angled triangle, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.
So, the side length of the new square is .
This matches the side length we calculated in Step 1. Since all four such triangles are identical, all four sides of the inner figure are equal. Also, the angles of the inner figure are all , making it a square. The area of this new square is , which is half the area of the original square.
Step 3 — Steps for Construction
First, draw the given square. Then, find the midpoint of each of its four sides. You can do this by measuring each side and marking the halfway point. Finally, connect these four midpoints with straight lines. The figure formed in the center is the square with half the area of the original square.

Answer
To construct a square with half the area of a given square:
(i) Find the midpoint of each of the four sides of the original square. (ii) Connect these four midpoints with straight lines. (iii) The figure formed by connecting the midpoints is the desired square with half the area.
More questions in IT
How can one construct a square having double the area of a given square?
Why does the new dotted square have double the area of the original square?
In many of the constructions in the Śulba-Sūtra, it is desirable to construct, where needed, what Baudhāyana calls ‘east-west’ and ‘north-south’ lines, i.e., horizontal and vertical lines that are perpendicular to each other. Can you draw some horizontal and vertical lines to see why the new square has double the area of the original square? You could draw some horizontal and vertical lines as shown on the right.
Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?
[Hint: From the diagonal property of a square, the line that bisects an angle passes through the opposite vertex. Argue why the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square bisect the two angles of the dotted square.**]
Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.
Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?
Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?
Why is the smaller inside square half the area of the larger square?
Again, adding some east-west and north-south lines can explain it:
Why is PQRS a square? Why is its area half that of the original paper?
Explain by connecting QS and PR, finding the different angles formed, and then using tringle congruence.
Find the hypotenuse of this isosceles right triangle.
What is the value of ?
Is less than or greater than 1?
Is less than or greater than 2?
Can we find closer bounds for ?
Will we ever get a number with a terminating decimal representation whose square is 2?
If there is such a terminating decimal starting with 1.414... whose square is 2, then it must have a non-zero last digit. If this is the case, then the decimal representation of its square will also have a non-zero last digit after the decimal point. For example, if is of the form 1.414...4, then its square will be of the form—
Use this formula to check your answers in the Figure it Out on page 39.
What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?
Why does Baudhāyana’s method work?
Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?
Explain why all the angles of this new 4-sided figure are right angles and so it is a square.
List down all the Baudhāyana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20.
Is there an unending sequence of Baudhāyana triples?
Is (30, 40, 50) a Baudhāyana triple?
Is (300, 400, 500) a Baudhāyana triple?
Context: The list of Baudhāyana triples having numbers less than or equal to 20 contains the following triples — (3, 4, 5), (6, 8, 10), (9, 12, 15), (12, 16, 20).
Q. Do you see any pattern among them?
Context: All these triples can be obtained by multiplying each term of (3, 4, 5) by a certain positive integer.
Q. Can we form a conjecture on Baudhāyana triples based on this observation?
Context: Conjecture: (3k, 4k, 5k) is a Baudhāyana triple, where k is any positive integer.
Q. Is this true?
Is a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20?
Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?
If is non-primitive, and the integers have — greater than 1 — as a common factor, then is a Baudhayana triple? Check this statement for . Justify this statement.