Squares and Square Roots | IT

Question 17

Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?

Question diagram 1
Check your answer with HomiSolve it yourself, then let Homi check your steps and spot mistakes.
Solution
Understand the Question
  • When two squares are of equal size with side length ss, each has an area of s2s^2.
  • Arranging them along the legs of a right-angled triangle forms an isosceles right-angled triangle with legs of length ss.
  • By the Pythagoras theorem, the square on the hypotenuse has an area equal to the sum of the two squares: s2+s2=2s2s^2 + s^2 = 2s^2.
  • This gives a side length of s2s\sqrt{2}, which completely agrees with the earlier method of combining two squares by summing their areas.

Step 1 · Analyze the Case of Equal Squares Using Pythagoras Theorem

Let the two initial squares have side length ss.

Area A=s×s=s2\text{Area A} = s \times s = s^2 Area B=s×s=s2\text{Area B} = s \times s = s^2

Since the squares are built on the legs of a right-angled triangle, both legs are equal to ss, forming an isosceles right-angled triangle.Diagram 1

Let cc be the hypotenuse (the side length of the square on the hypotenuse).

By Pythagoras theorem

c2=s2+s2c2=2s2c=2s2=2×s2c=s2\begin{aligned} c^2 &= s^2 + s^2 \\ c^2 &= 2s^2 \\ c &= \sqrt{2s^2} \\ &= \sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{s^2} \\ c &= s\sqrt{2} \end{aligned}

Thus, the method works because the area of the square on the hypotenuse is the sum of the areas of the two smaller squares.

Step 2 · Compare with the Earlier Area Addition Method

In the earlier method, combining two identical squares of area s2s^2 gives a total combined area of: Total Area=s2+s2=2s2\text{Total Area} = s^2 + s^2 = 2s^2

If XX is the side length of the combined square

X2=2s2X=2s2X=s2\begin{aligned} X^2 &= 2s^2 \\ X &= \sqrt{2s^2} \\ X &= s\sqrt{2} \end{aligned}

Both methods produce the exact same side length s2s\sqrt{2}.

Answer

Yes, the method works for equal-sized squares because it represents the Pythagoras theorem for an isosceles right-angled triangle, giving a side length of s2s\sqrt{2}. This completely agrees with the earlier method of combining two squares of area s2s^2 to get a total area of 2s22s^2 with side length 2s2=s2\sqrt{2s^2} = s\sqrt{2}.

Common Mistakes
  • Adding Side Lengths Directly: Incorrectly assuming the side of the combined square is s+s=2ss + s = 2s instead of adding areas (s2+s2=2s2    side=s2s^2 + s^2 = 2s^2 \implies \text{side} = s\sqrt{2}).
  • Forgetting to Take the Square Root: Identifying the new area as 2s22s^2 but forgetting that the side length requires taking the square root: 2s2=s2\sqrt{2s^2} = s\sqrt{2}.

More questions in IT

Q1

How can one construct a square having double the area of a given square?

Q2

Why does the new dotted square have double the area of the original square?

In many of the constructions in the Śulba-Sūtra, it is desirable to construct, where needed, what Baudhāyana calls ‘east-west’ and ‘north-south’ lines, i.e., horizontal and vertical lines that are perpendicular to each other. Can you draw some horizontal and vertical lines to see why the new square has double the area of the original square? You could draw some horizontal and vertical lines as shown on the right.

Q3

Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?

[Hint: From the diagonal property of a square, the line that bisects an angle passes through the opposite vertex. Argue why the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square bisect the two angles of the dotted square.**]

Q4

Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.

Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?

Q5

Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?

Q6

Why is the smaller inside square half the area of the larger square?

Again, adding some east-west and north-south lines can explain it:

Q7

Why is PQRSPQRS a square? Why is its area half that of the original paper?

Explain by connecting QSQS and PRPR, finding the different angles formed, and then using tringle congruence.

Q8

Find the hypotenuse of this isosceles right triangle.

Q9

What is the value of 2\sqrt{2}?

Q10

Is 2\sqrt{2} less than or greater than 1?

Q11

Is 2\sqrt{2} less than or greater than 2?

Q12

Can we find closer bounds for 2\sqrt{2}?

Q13

Will we ever get a number with a terminating decimal representation whose square is 2?

If there is such a terminating decimal starting with 1.4141.414\dots whose square is 2, then it must have a non-zero last digit. If this is the case, then the decimal representation of its square will also have a non-zero last digit after the decimal point. For example, if 2\sqrt{2} is of the form 1.41441.414\dots4, then its square will be of the form—

Q14

Use this formula to check your answers in the Figure it Out on page 39.

Q15

What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?

Q16

Why does Baudhāyana’s method work?

Q17

Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?

Q19

Explain why all the angles of this new 4-sided figure are right angles and so it is a square.

Q20

List down all the Baudhāyana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20.

Q21

Is there an unending sequence of Baudhāyana triples?

Q22

Is (30,40,50)(30, 40, 50) a Baudhāyana triple?

Is (300,400,500)(300, 400, 500) a Baudhāyana triple?

Q23

Context: The list of Baudhāyana triples having numbers less than or equal to 20 contains the following triples — (3,4,5)(3, 4, 5), (6,8,10)(6, 8, 10), (9,12,15)(9, 12, 15), (12,16,20)(12, 16, 20).

Q. Do you see any pattern among them?

Q24

Context: All these triples can be obtained by multiplying each term of (3,4,5)(3, 4, 5) by a certain positive integer.

Q. Can we form a conjecture on Baudhāyana triples based on this observation?

Q25

Context: Conjecture: (3k,4k,5k)(3k, 4k, 5k) is a Baudhāyana triple, where kk is any positive integer.

Q. Is this true?

Q26

Is (5,12,13)(5, 12, 13) a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 2020?

Q27

Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?

Q28

If (a,b,c)(a, b, c) is non-primitive, and the integers have ff — greater than 1 — as a common factor, then is (af,bf,cf)\left(\dfrac{a}{f}, \dfrac{b}{f}, \dfrac{c}{f}\right) a Baudhayana triple? Check this statement for (9,12,15)(9, 12, 15). Justify this statement.

← Back to Squares and Square Roots