Fractals and Visualising Solids | FIO

Question 22

Observe this triangle.

(i) Would it be possible to build a model out of actual cubes? What are the front, top, and side profiles of this impossible triangle? (ii) Recreate this on an isometric grid. (iii) Why does the illusion work?

Question diagram 1
Check your answer with HomiSolve it yourself, then let Homi check your steps and spot mistakes.
Solution
Understand the Question
  • An impossible triangle (or Penrose triangle) is an optical illusion: a two-dimensional drawing that the brain perceives as a three-dimensional solid, but which cannot physically exist in three-dimensional space.
  • The illusion relies on contradictory depth cues drawn along isometric grid lines (3030^\circ angles and vertical axes).
  • Viewing the figure orthographically (from front, top, or side) projects the outer 5×55 \times 5 shape with an inner 2×22 \times 2 cutout.

(i) Would it be possible to build a model out of actual cubes? What are the front, top, and side profiles of this impossible triangle?

Step 1 · Feasibility and Orthographic Profiles

Diagram 1

1. Physical Feasibility:

  • No, it is impossible to build this model with actual cubes in 3D space.
  • The 2D drawing connects corners that exist at mutually incompatible depths, creating a geometric contradiction.

2. Profiles (Orthographic Views): Each arm is 5 units5\text{ units} long and 1 unit1\text{ unit} thick, with an inner opening of 2×2 units2 \times 2\text{ units}.

  • Front Profile: A right-angled triangle with base =5 units= 5\text{ units} and height =5 units= 5\text{ units}, containing a 2×2 unit2 \times 2\text{ unit} square hole at the right-angle corner.
  • Top Profile: Identical to the front profile (5×5 unit5 \times 5\text{ unit} right-angled triangle with a 2×2 unit2 \times 2\text{ unit} square hole).
  • Side Profile (Right Side): Identical to the front and top profiles (5×5 unit5 \times 5\text{ unit} right-angled triangle with a 2×2 unit2 \times 2\text{ unit} square hole).
Answer

(i) No, it cannot be built with actual cubes. The front, top, and side profiles are all identical: a right-angled triangle of base 5 units5\text{ units} and height 5 units5\text{ units} with a 2×2 unit2 \times 2\text{ unit} square opening at the corner.

(ii) Recreate this on an isometric grid.

Step 1 · Recreate on an Isometric Grid

Diagram 2

To draw the impossible triangle on an isometric grid:

  1. Draw the bottom horizontal arm (5 cubes5\text{ cubes} long) along one of the 3030^\circ isometric axes.
  2. Draw the vertical arm (5 cubes5\text{ cubes} high) upwards from one end along the vertical grid line.
  3. Draw the third diagonal arm (5 cubes5\text{ cubes} long) along the opposite 3030^\circ axis to complete the triangular loop.
  4. Add a thickness of 1 cube1\text{ cube} to each arm using parallel grid lines.
  5. Leave a central 2×2 cube2 \times 2\text{ cube} opening inside the triangle.
Answer

(ii) Draw three mutually intersecting arms each 5 cubes5\text{ cubes} long and 1 cube1\text{ cube} thick along the isometric grid axes (3030^\circ and vertical), leaving a central 2×22 \times 2 cube opening.

(iii) Why does the illusion work?

Step 1 · Reason for the Optical Illusion

  • The human brain interprets 2D images by assuming standard rules of 3D depth, perspective, and continuity.
  • In this drawing, each individual joint appears locally plausible and three-dimensional.
  • However, globally the drawing joins foreground and background elements continuously, forcing contradictory depth cues that the brain cannot reconcile into a single valid 3D solid.
Answer

(iii) The illusion works because each corner looks locally valid in 3D, but together they present contradictory depth cues that the brain cannot resolve into a physically possible 3D object.

Common Mistakes
  • Assuming Different Profiles: Assuming that the front, top, and side profiles look different; due to the symmetrical cubic structure, all three 2D orthographic projections are identical.
  • 2D Drawing vs. 3D Reality: Confusing the ability to draw a figure on 2D isometric paper with the physical possibility of constructing it in 3D space.

More questions in FIO

Q1

Draw the initial few steps (at least till Step 2) of the shape sequence that leads to the Sierpinski Triangle.

Q2

Find the number of holes, and the triangles that remain at each step of the shape sequence that leads to the Sierpinski Triangle.

Q3

Find the area of the region remaining at the nnth step in each of the shape sequences that lead to the Sierpinski fractals. Take the area of the starting square/triangle to be 1 sq. unit.

Q4

Draw the initial few steps (at least till Step 2) of the shape sequence that leads to the Koch Snowflake.

Q5

Find the number of sides in the nthn^{\text{th}} step of the shape sequence that leads to the Koch Snowflake.

Q6

Find the perimeter of the shape at the nthn\text{th} step of the sequence. Take the starting equilateral triangle to have a sidelength of 1 unit.

Q7

Figure it Out

  1. Which of the following are the nets of a cube? First, try to answer by visualisation. Then, you may use cutouts and try.
Q8

A cube has 11 possible net structures in total. In this count, two nets are considered the same if one can be obtained from the other by a rotation or a flip. For example, the following nets are all considered the same —

Find all the 11 nets of a cube.

Q9

Draw a net of a cuboid having sidelengths:

(i) 5 cm5\text{ cm}, 3 cm3\text{ cm}, and 1 cm1\text{ cm}

(ii) 6 cm6\text{ cm}, 3 cm3\text{ cm}, and 2 cm2\text{ cm}

Q10

Observe the front view, top view and side view of the different lines in Fig. 4.6. Is there any relation between their lengths?

Q11

Find the front view, top view and side view of each of the following solids, fixing its orientation with respect to the vertical, horizontal and side planes: cube, cuboid, parallelepiped, cylinder, cone, prism, and pyramid. If needed, see the next problem for clues.

Q12

Match each of the following objects with its projections.

Q13

Draw the top view, front view and the side view of each of the following combinations of identical cubes.

Q14

Imagine eight identical cubes, glued together along faces to form the letter 'C'.

Q15

Which solid corresponds to the given top view, front view, and side view?

Solids to choose from:

Q16

Using identical cubes, make a solid that gives the following projections:

Q17

Find the number of cubes in this stack of identical cubes.

Q18

What are the different shapes the projection of a cube can make under different orientations?

Q19

In addition to the 5 ways shown in Fig. 4.8, are there any additional ways of gluing four cubes together along faces? Can you visualise and draw these as well?

Q20

Draw the following figures on the isometric grid.

[Hint: It may be useful to determine whether the edge to be currently drawn — say, along the height — goes from down to up or up to down. Accordingly, draw the line segment on the grid either in the direction of the height axis or opposite to it.]

Q21

Is there anything strange about the path of this ball? Recreate it on the isometric grid.

[Hint: Consider a portion of this figure that is physically realisable and identify the 3 primary directions.]

Q22

Observe this triangle.

(i) Would it be possible to build a model out of actual cubes? What are the front, top, and side profiles of this impossible triangle? (ii) Recreate this on an isometric grid. (iii) Why does the illusion work?

← Back to Fractals and Visualising Solids