Question 6
Given that is a cyclic quadrilateral and also its diagonals bisect each other. What can you conclude about the quadrilateral?
- A quadrilateral whose diagonals bisect each other is a parallelogram, which means opposite angles are equal ( and ).
- In a cyclic quadrilateral, opposite angles are supplementary ().
- Combining these properties allows us to determine the angle measures and identify the exact type of quadrilateral.
Step 1 · Use Diagonal Property to Identify Parallelogram
Since the diagonals of bisect each other, is a parallelogram.
In a parallelogram, opposite angles are equal:
Step 2 · Find the Measure of Each Angle

Since is a cyclic quadrilateral, the sum of opposite angles is :
Substituting :
Since , we have .
In a parallelogram, consecutive angles sum to :
Since , we have .
Therefore, all four angles are .
Step 3 · Conclude the Quadrilateral Type
A parallelogram in which all interior angles are is a rectangle.
Therefore, is a rectangle.
The quadrilateral is a rectangle.
- Assuming it is a Square: Concluding that is a square without information that adjacent sides are equal or diagonals are perpendicular.
- Confusing Angle Properties: Forgetting that opposite angles are equal in a parallelogram () but supplementary in a cyclic quadrilateral ().
More questions in A1.2
Given that all women are mortal, and suppose that A is a woman, what can we conclude about A?
Given that the product of two rational numbers is rational, and suppose and are rationals, what can you conclude about ?
Given that the decimal expansion of irrational numbers is non-terminating, non-recurring, and is irrational, what can we conclude about the decimal expansion of ?
Given that and , what can we conclude about the value of ?
Given that ABCD is a parallelogram and . What can you conclude about the other angles of the parallelogram?
Given that is a cyclic quadrilateral and also its diagonals bisect each other. What can you conclude about the quadrilateral?
Given that is irrational for all primes and also suppose that 3721 is a prime. Can you conclude that is an irrational number? Is your conclusion correct? Why or why not?