Question 7
Do you see a way of extending this method to represent bigger numbers as well? How?

- Roman numerals represent numbers using seven standard symbols: .
- Larger numbers are formed systematically by combining these symbols using three fundamental rules: Repetition, Addition (placing smaller values to the right), and Subtraction (placing smaller values to the left).
- Numbers in the thousands and beyond can also be represented using bar notation (vinculum), where a horizontal bar over a symbol multiplies its value by .
Step 1 · Basic Roman Numeral Symbols
The seven basic symbols and their values are:
Step 2 · Rules for Combining Symbols
1. Rule of Repetition: A symbol can be repeated up to three times consecutively to add its value:
- (Note: , , and are never repeated.)
2. Rule of Addition (Right Placement): When a smaller symbol is placed to the right of a larger symbol, its value is added:
3. Rule of Subtraction (Left Placement): When a smaller symbol is placed to the left of a larger symbol, its value is subtracted:
- subtracted from and : ,
- subtracted from and : ,
- subtracted from and : , (Note: , , and are never subtracted.)
Step 3 · Representing Larger Numbers and Bar Notation
By breaking large numbers into place values (thousands, hundreds, tens, ones):
- is decomposed as:
Bar Notation for Multiples of 1000: A bar over a numeral multiplies its value by :
Yes, we can extend this method to represent bigger numbers by using the standard symbols (), applying the rules of repetition, addition, and subtraction, and using bar notation () for values in the thousands.
- Over-repetition: Repeating symbols like more than times (e.g., writing as instead of , or as instead of ).
- Repeating Non-repeatable Symbols: Repeating or (e.g., writing as instead of ).
- Invalid Subtractions: Subtracting across multiple power-of-ten levels (e.g., writing as instead of , or as instead of ).
More questions in IT
Q. Reema's curiosity was sparked, and questions started swirling in her head:
(i) Since when have humans been counting?
(ii) What was their need for counting? What were they counting?
(iii) Since when have people been writing numbers in the modern form?
(iv) How would the Mesopotamians have written ? ? ?
Context: Imagine that we are living in the Stone Age, say, around ten thousand years ago. Suppose we have a herd of cows.
Q. How do we ensure that all cows have returned safely after grazing?
Context: Imagine that we are living in the Stone Age, say, around ten thousand years ago. Suppose we have a herd of cows.
Q. Do we have fewer cows than our neighbour?
Context: Imagine that we are living in the Stone Age, say, around ten thousand years ago. Suppose we have a herd of cows.
Q. If there are fewer, how many more cows would we need so that we have the same number of cows as our neighbour?
Context: Suppose we have a herd of cows. We want to answer the following questions: Q2. Do we have fewer cows than our neighbour? Q3. If there are fewer, how many more cows would we need so that we have the same number of cows as our neighbour?
Q. How will you use such sticks to answer the other two questions (Q2 and Q3)?
How many numbers can you represent in this way using the sounds of the letters of your language?
Do you see a way of extending this method to represent bigger numbers as well? How?
Context: A group of indigenous people in Australia called the Gumulgal had the following words for their numbers:
- urapon
- ukasar
- ukasar-urapon
- ukasar-ukasar
- ukasar-ukasar-urapon
- ukasar-ukasar-ukasar
Q. Can you see how their number names are formed?
Context: A group of indigenous people in Australia called the Gumulgal had the following words for their numbers:
- urapon
- ukasar
- ukasar-urapon
- ukasar-ukasar
- ukasar-ukasar-urapon
- ukasar-ukasar-ukasar
Q. Can you see how the names of the other numbers are formed?
What could be the difficulties with using a number system that counts only in groups of a single particular size? How would you represent a number like 1345 in a system that counts only by 5s?
Do it yourself now:
(b)
How will you multiply two numbers given in Roman numerals, without converting them to Hindu numerals? Try to find the product of the following pairs of landmark numbers: , , , .
Instead of grouping together 10 collections of size equal to the previous landmark number (as in the case of the Egyptian system), can we get a number system by grouping together 5 collections of size equal to the previous landmark number? Can this 5 be replaced by any positive integer?
What is any landmark number multiplied by (that is )? Find the following products—
Each landmark number is a power of and so multiplying it with increases the power by , which is the next landmark number.
What is any landmark number multiplied by ()? Find the following products—
Find the following products—
Thus, the product of any two landmark numbers is another landmark number!
Context: Thus, the product of any two landmark numbers is another landmark number!
Q. Does this property hold true in the base-5 system that we created? Does this hold for any number system with a base?
Now find the following products—
What would be a simple rule to multiply a number with ?
Context: To get an idea of how the abacus was used for calculations, let us consider a simple addition problem: . The two numbers were taken on either side of the vertical partition.
Q. How would you use this to find the sum?
Context: To get an idea of how the abacus was used for calculations, let us consider a simple addition problem: . The two numbers were taken on either side of the vertical partition. The counters along each line were brought together.
Q. What is to be done if the total in a line exceeded ?
Look at the representation of 60. What will be the representation for 3,600?
How is this to be read?
Represent the following numbers using the Mayan system:
(i) 77 (ii) 100 (iii) 361 (iv) 721
Where does the Hindu/Indian number system figure in the evolution of ideas of number representation? What are its landmark numbers? And does it use a place value system?