Question 44
Were you able to tile this? How can we be sure that this is not tileable? Can you find another unit square that, when removed from a grid, makes it non-tileable?

We can use a checkerboard coloring to show if a region can be tiled by dominoes.
Step 1 — Count squares in the region
Let us first count the total number of squares in the region to be tiled. The region is a grid with 3 columns and 5 rows. The top row has 2 squares. The other four rows each have 3 squares. So, the total number of squares is the sum of squares in each row.
Since each tile covers 2 squares, we would need tiles. This is an even number, so tiling might be possible.

Step 2 — Count black and white squares
Let us color the grid like a checkerboard. We can see this in the "Black and white grid" diagram. Let us count the number of black and white squares in the region. We will count the white squares first. Row 1 has 2 white squares. Row 2 has 1 white square. Row 3 has 2 white squares. Row 4 has 1 white square. Row 5 has 2 white squares. The total number of white squares is the sum of white squares in each row.
Now, let us count the black squares. Row 1 has 0 black squares. Row 2 has 2 black squares. Row 3 has 1 black square. Row 4 has 2 black squares. Row 5 has 1 black square. The total number of black squares is the sum of black squares in each row.

Step 3 — Check for tileability
Each tile is a or domino. When placed on a checkerboard, each domino always covers exactly one black square and one white square. For a region to be tileable by these dominoes, it must have an equal number of black and white squares. In our region, we found 8 white squares and 6 black squares. The number of white squares is not equal to the number of black squares. So, the region cannot be tiled.
Step 4 — Find another non-tileable removal
Let us consider a full grid. We will color it like a checkerboard, starting with white at the top-left corner. Let's count the black and white squares in a full grid. Rows 1, 3, 5 each have 2 white and 1 black square. Rows 2, 4 each have 1 white and 2 black squares. Total white squares = . Total black squares = . The full grid has 8 white squares and 7 black squares. The total number of squares is . Since 15 is an odd number, a full grid cannot be tiled by dominoes.
The question asks to remove one unit square from a grid. After removing one square, the remaining number of squares will be . This is an even number. For the remaining region to be non-tileable, the number of black and white squares must be unequal. If we remove a white square: Remaining white squares = . Remaining black squares = . The counts are equal, so it might be tileable. If we remove a black square: Remaining white squares = . Remaining black squares = . The counts are unequal, so it will be non-tileable.
The original problem's region was a grid with the top-middle square (1,2) removed. This square is black. So, we need to choose another black square to remove. Let's choose the square at position (2,1), which is the first square in the second row. This square is black. If we remove the square at (2,1) from the grid: The number of white squares remains 8. The number of black squares becomes . Since 8 is not equal to 6, this new region is non-tileable.
Answer
(i) No, we were not able to tile this region. (ii) We can be sure it is not tileable because a checkerboard coloring shows 8 white squares and 6 black squares. Each tile covers one white and one black square. Since the number of white squares is not equal to the number of black squares, the region cannot be tiled. (iii) Removing the square at position (2,1) (second row, first column) from a grid makes it non-tileable.
More questions in IT
How do we find such A and B?
From X and Y, draw arcs above and below XY, with the same radii. The two points at which the arcs meet, above and below XY, give us A and B, respectively.
Use this to construct an eye.
In Fig. 6.1, join A and B with a line. Where does AB intersect XY, and what is the angle formed between them?
Will the line joining the two points at which the arcs meet, above and below XY, always be the perpendicular bisector of XY, i.e., when XY is of any length, and the arcs are drawn using a radius of any length?
Which two triangles should be congruent for AB to be the perpendicular bisector of XY (that is, O is the midpoint of XY and AB is perpendicular to XY)?
How do we get these different shapes? Try!
Will C and D lie on the perpendicular bisector AB?
Justify the following statement using the facts that we have established.
Any point that has the same distance from X and Y lies on the perpendicular bisector of XY.
Given a line segment XY, how do we draw its perpendicular bisector using only an unmarked ruler and a compass?
Can we extend the method of constructing the perpendicular bisector to construct a 90° angle at any point on a line? Draw a line and mark a point O on it. Construct a 90° angle at point O.
Find a segment of this line for which O is the midpoint.
How do we construct this figure?
What is the angle between two adjacent lines?
How do we construct a 45° angle using only a ruler and a compass?
Construct the following figure.
Draw an angle. Create a copy of this angle using only a ruler and compass.
How do we implement this idea using a ruler and a compass?
How did they make these arches?
Construct this arch shape on a piece of paper.
Let us think about the support lines this figure will need.
For symmetry, we should have , and . How would you construct these support lines?
Use these support lines to construct an arch. If required, adjust the radii of the arcs to make the arch look more aesthetically pleasing.
How do we construct this shape?
What supporting lines will you use to draw this arch?
Remember 'Wavy Wave' from the Grade 6 Textbook?
The supporting lines are just two line segments of equal length.
If their midpoints are marked, will you be able to construct a pointed arch?
How do we construct a regular pentagon (5-sided figure) and a regular hexagon (6-sided figure)? To begin with, try to construct a pentagon and hexagon with equal sidelengths.
Can we break a regular hexagon into smaller pieces that can be constructed?
Can six congruent equilateral triangles be placed together as in Fig. 6.12? If yes, will it result in a regular hexagon?
Consider this figure. Will the 70° angle fit into the gap? What is the gap angle ?
We have, .
Use this to determine whether the 70° angle fits the gap.
In Fig. 6.12 can you explain why AOD, BOE and COF are straight lines?
Construct a regular hexagon with a sidelength 4 cm using a ruler and a compass.
Context: We can construct a regular hexagon more directly if we can construct a 120° angle using a ruler and a compass.
Q. How do we do it?
Why is ? Is there an equilateral triangle here?
Construct a regular hexagon of sidelength 5 cm.
How will you construct 30° and 15° angles?
Construct the following 6-pointed star. Note that it has a rotational symmetry.
Are the six triangles forming the 6 points of the star — AGH, BHI, CIJ, DJK, ELK, FLG — equilateral? Why?
[Hint: Find the angles.]
Can a grid be tiled using multiple copies of tiles? We are allowed to rotate a tile and use it.
Can a grid be tiled using tiles?
What about a grid?
Complete the justification.
Is an grid tileable with tiles, if both and are even? If yes, come up with a general strategy to tile it.
Is an grid tileable with tiles, if one of and is even and the other is odd? If yes, come up with a general strategy to tile it.
Is an grid tileable with tiles, if both and are odd? Give reasons.
Here is a grid, with a unit square removed. Now, it has an even number of unit squares. Is it tileable with tiles?
Is the following region tileable with tiles?
Context: We are considering whether a given region can be tiled using tiles.
Q. What about this one?
Were you able to tile this? How can we be sure that this is not tileable? Can you find another unit square that, when removed from a grid, makes it non-tileable?
If the plain grid is tileable, is the black-and-white-grid tileable?
If the black-and-white grid is tileable, is the plain grid tileable?
Use this idea to find another unit square that, when removed from a 5 × 3 grid, makes it non-tileable?