Question 41
Here is a grid, with a unit square removed. Now, it has an even number of unit squares. Is it tileable with tiles?

We will use a chessboard coloring method to solve this problem.
Step 1 — Count the squares
First, let us find the total number of unit squares in the grid. The grid has 5 rows. It has 3 columns. So, the total number of squares is:
One unit square is removed from this grid. Let us find the number of squares remaining.
Each tile covers exactly two unit squares. So, if the grid can be tiled, it must have an even number of squares. Our grid has 14 squares, which is an even number. This means tiling might be possible.

Step 2 — Use chessboard coloring
Let us color the grid like a chessboard. We can start with a black square at the top-left corner. Let's count the number of black and white squares.
Original grid coloring (B = Black, W = White): B W B W B W B W B W B W B W B
Let us count the black squares. Row 1 has 2 black squares. Row 2 has 1 black square. Row 3 has 2 black squares. Row 4 has 1 black square. Row 5 has 2 black squares. Total black squares:
Let us count the white squares. Row 1 has 1 white square. Row 2 has 2 white squares. Row 3 has 1 white square. Row 4 has 2 white squares. Row 5 has 1 white square. Total white squares:
So, the original grid has 8 black squares and 7 white squares. The removed square is the center square. Looking at our coloring, the center square (row 3, column 2) is White. When this white square is removed, the number of white squares changes. The number of black squares remains the same.
Remaining black squares: 8 Remaining white squares:
For a grid to be tileable by tiles, it must have an equal number of black and white squares. Our remaining grid has 8 black squares and 6 white squares. These numbers are not equal. So, the grid cannot be tiled by tiles.
Answer
No, the grid is not tileable with tiles.
More questions in IT
How do we find such A and B?
From X and Y, draw arcs above and below XY, with the same radii. The two points at which the arcs meet, above and below XY, give us A and B, respectively.
Use this to construct an eye.
In Fig. 6.1, join A and B with a line. Where does AB intersect XY, and what is the angle formed between them?
Will the line joining the two points at which the arcs meet, above and below XY, always be the perpendicular bisector of XY, i.e., when XY is of any length, and the arcs are drawn using a radius of any length?
Which two triangles should be congruent for AB to be the perpendicular bisector of XY (that is, O is the midpoint of XY and AB is perpendicular to XY)?
How do we get these different shapes? Try!
Will C and D lie on the perpendicular bisector AB?
Justify the following statement using the facts that we have established.
Any point that has the same distance from X and Y lies on the perpendicular bisector of XY.
Given a line segment XY, how do we draw its perpendicular bisector using only an unmarked ruler and a compass?
Can we extend the method of constructing the perpendicular bisector to construct a 90° angle at any point on a line? Draw a line and mark a point O on it. Construct a 90° angle at point O.
Find a segment of this line for which O is the midpoint.
How do we construct this figure?
What is the angle between two adjacent lines?
How do we construct a 45° angle using only a ruler and a compass?
Construct the following figure.
Draw an angle. Create a copy of this angle using only a ruler and compass.
How do we implement this idea using a ruler and a compass?
How did they make these arches?
Construct this arch shape on a piece of paper.
Let us think about the support lines this figure will need.
For symmetry, we should have , and . How would you construct these support lines?
Use these support lines to construct an arch. If required, adjust the radii of the arcs to make the arch look more aesthetically pleasing.
How do we construct this shape?
What supporting lines will you use to draw this arch?
Remember 'Wavy Wave' from the Grade 6 Textbook?
The supporting lines are just two line segments of equal length.
If their midpoints are marked, will you be able to construct a pointed arch?
How do we construct a regular pentagon (5-sided figure) and a regular hexagon (6-sided figure)? To begin with, try to construct a pentagon and hexagon with equal sidelengths.
Can we break a regular hexagon into smaller pieces that can be constructed?
Can six congruent equilateral triangles be placed together as in Fig. 6.12? If yes, will it result in a regular hexagon?
Consider this figure. Will the 70° angle fit into the gap? What is the gap angle ?
We have, .
Use this to determine whether the 70° angle fits the gap.
In Fig. 6.12 can you explain why AOD, BOE and COF are straight lines?
Construct a regular hexagon with a sidelength 4 cm using a ruler and a compass.
Context: We can construct a regular hexagon more directly if we can construct a 120° angle using a ruler and a compass.
Q. How do we do it?
Why is ? Is there an equilateral triangle here?
Construct a regular hexagon of sidelength 5 cm.
How will you construct 30° and 15° angles?
Construct the following 6-pointed star. Note that it has a rotational symmetry.
Are the six triangles forming the 6 points of the star — AGH, BHI, CIJ, DJK, ELK, FLG — equilateral? Why?
[Hint: Find the angles.]
Can a grid be tiled using multiple copies of tiles? We are allowed to rotate a tile and use it.
Can a grid be tiled using tiles?
What about a grid?
Complete the justification.
Is an grid tileable with tiles, if both and are even? If yes, come up with a general strategy to tile it.
Is an grid tileable with tiles, if one of and is even and the other is odd? If yes, come up with a general strategy to tile it.
Is an grid tileable with tiles, if both and are odd? Give reasons.
Here is a grid, with a unit square removed. Now, it has an even number of unit squares. Is it tileable with tiles?
Is the following region tileable with tiles?
Context: We are considering whether a given region can be tiled using tiles.
Q. What about this one?
Were you able to tile this? How can we be sure that this is not tileable? Can you find another unit square that, when removed from a grid, makes it non-tileable?
If the plain grid is tileable, is the black-and-white-grid tileable?
If the black-and-white grid is tileable, is the plain grid tileable?
Use this idea to find another unit square that, when removed from a 5 × 3 grid, makes it non-tileable?